4.2 Article

DEMOGRAPHY AND PHYLOGENETIC UTILITY OF NUMT PSEUDOGENES IN THE SOUTHERN RED-BACKED VOLE (MYODES GAPPERI)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 561-570

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/08-MAMM-A-149R1.1

Keywords

Arvicolinae; Clethrionomys; cytochrome b; mitochondrial transfer; nuclear integration

Categories

Funding

  1. Purdue University
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. United States Department of Agriculture's National Research Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nuclear copies of mitochondrial DNA fragments (numts) have been reported in a number of mammalian taxa. The inclusion of these numt pseudogenes within mitochondrial data sets can unknowingly compromise the integrity of: phylogenetic, systematic, and biogeographic studies. Here, we evaluate 6 unique cytochrome-b numt sequences isolated in the southern red-backed vole (Myodes [formerly Clethrionomys] gapperi). Each sequence contains features characteristic of numt pseudogenes including premature stop codons, insertions-deletions (indels), frame-shift substitutions, and transposable element insertions. Mitochondrial and nuclear sequences are evolving at different rates. Molecular dating indicates that this group of mitochondrial transfers originated similar to 4.6 million years ago, which predates the presumptive origin of the genus. Phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear sequences suggest that the numts are the result of at least I nuclear insertion followed by subsequent duplication events, but pairwise sequence comparisons do not support this assertion. This conflict is likely the result of incomplete numt sampling from the M,odes nuclear genome. Genome sequencing efforts Will ultimately provide the data needed to fully characterize numt demography in different lineages, and we predict that numts will have phylogenetic utility as informative synapomorphies in closely related species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available