4.2 Article

POPULATION ECOLOGY OF WILD MONGOLIAN GERBILS MERIONES UNGUICULATUS

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 832-840

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/08-MAMM-A-265.1

Keywords

demography; mark-recapture method; multistate model; population dynamics; robust-design model; survival probability; survival-reproduction trade-off

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30770292]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [CXTDS2005-4]
  3. Mississippi State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Northern rodent populations often exhibit temporal dynamics due to seasonal changes in demographic processes such as survival, reproduction, and movement. Seasonal patterns in their demography partially result from seasonal changes in climate and resource availability. We studied the population ecology of Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus), a social rodent living in groups year-round in desert grasslands of China, Mongolia, and Russia, using capture-recapture methods to investigate seasonal patterns in demography. Gerbils were livetrapped biweekly from late April to late October 2006 in Inner Mongolian grasslands, China. We used robust-design models and Cormack-Jolly-Seber models to estimate population size and apparent survival probability. Additionally, we used multistate models to test for a trade-off between reproduction and survival. Like other northern rodents, Mongolian gerbils showed a single annual peak in abundance, but gerbil numbers peaked unusually early in June. Gerbil populations were female-biased and also biased toward older individuals. The breeding season was restricted to the wet season from April to the end of August, and survival declined from April to October. We found a trade-off between survival and reproduction in males but not in females. Kinship and cooperation among females may enhance survival to offset the cost of reproduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available