4.2 Article

MAPPING THE LANDSCAPE OF FEAR OF THE CAPE GROUND SQUIRREL (XERUS INAURIS)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages 1162-1169

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/08-MAMM-A-035.1

Keywords

Cape ground squirrel; foraging; giving up density; habitat assessment; landscape of fear; predation risk; Xerus inauris

Categories

Funding

  1. United States Aid for International Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The suitability of a habitat to all animal includes food availability, physical and climate factors, Population interactions. and safety from predators. Mappings of vegetation, sons, and microclimates across ecological landscapes have become standard and important fools for assessing an animal's habitat. More elusive to the researcher, yet of equal importance to the animal, has been the ability to map the predation risk perceived by an animal. Laundre et al., in developing the concept, defined the landscape of fear as the spatial map of the animal's Predation cost of foraging. We mapped this landscape of predation costs by measuring the use of depletable food (yielding giving up densities [GUDs]) arranged as a grid across the landscape of interest. The landscapes of fear for 3 colonies of Cape ground squirrels (Xerus inauris) in Auorabies Falls National Park, South Africa, revealed large and distinct spatial variation in predation costs that appeared to be governed primarily by proximity to buttows and open sight lines. By converting the GUDs into quitting harvest rates (joules per minute). we believe we have translated the animals' perceptions of risk into a physical map whose contours across the landscape represent lines of equal foraging costs. Among the 3 colonies only 3-22% of the space in low foraging costs (<2,500 J/min), whereas 31-92% of the sampled areas represented very high foraging costs (>5.000 J/min).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available