4.5 Article

Synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetic fluid used for magnetic resonance imaging and hyperthermia

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
Volume 323, Issue 23, Pages 2953-2959

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.05.060

Keywords

Magnetic nanoparticle; Magnetic fluid; Co-precipitation; Hyperthermia; Magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [20876100, 20736004]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB219904]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the ROCs of State Education Ministry (SRF for ROCS, SEM)
  4. State Key Lab. of Multiphase Complex System of the Chinese Academy of Science [2006-5]
  5. Key Lab. of Organic Synthesis of Jiangsu Prov., Jiangsu
  6. Commission of Science and Technology of Suzhou Municipality [YJS0917, SG0978]
  7. Technology Innovation Foundation of Suzhou SND District and SIP District
  8. MOST [10C26213201161, 11C26223204581]
  9. Minjiang Scholarship of Fujian Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles were prepared by co-precipitation from FeSO4 center dot 7H(2)O and FeCl3 center dot 6H(2)O aqueous solutions using NaOH as precipitating reagent. The nanoparticles have an average size of 12 nm and exhibit superparamagnetism at room temperature. The nanoparticles were used to prepare a water-based magnetic fluid using oleic acid and Tween 80 as surfactants. The stability and magnetic properties of the magnetic fluid were characterized by Gouy magnetic balance. The experimental results imply that the hydrophilic block of Tween 80 can make the Fe3O4 nanoparticles suspending in water stable even after dilution and autoclaving. The magnetic fluid demonstrates excellent stability and fast magneto-temperature response, which can be used both in magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic fluid hyperthermia. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available