4.5 Article

Mossbauer and magnetic studies in nickel ferrite nanoparticles: Effect of size distribution

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
Volume 322, Issue 23, Pages 3742-3747

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.07.019

Keywords

Nickel ferrite; Magnetic nanoparticle; Mossbauer spectroscopy; Hysteresis; Monte Carlo

Funding

  1. University Grants Commission, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The magnetic properties of nickel ferrite nanoparticles in the form of powders, prepared by the sol-gel process and subjected to different annealing temperatures, were investigated using both static and dynamic measurements namely hysteresis, zero field cooled-field cooled magnetization (ZFC-FC) measurements and Mossbauer spectroscopy. The Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) studies reveal particle sizes similar to 2-8 for the as-prepared particles which increases upto 52 nm with annealing. A bimodal distribution, upto an annealing temperature of 300 degrees C was observed. ZFC-FC measurements for the as-prepared samples reveal twin peaks, indicative of the bimodal size distribution. ZFC-FC measurements performed for fields varying from 100 Oe to 3 kOe show a superparamagnetic phase with blocking temperatures between 320 and . Numerical simulations for the ZFC-FC studies indicate that the signature of the bimodal size distribution can be seen only at very low fields. The variation of coercivity with particle size, as determined from the hysteresis measurements, shows a transition from a single domain to a multi domain state for particle sizes larger than 35 nm. Mossbauer measurements performed at room temperature for the as-prepared sample shows a six finger pattern for the samples with higher particle size and a doublet pattern for the samples with smaller particle size, which is indicative of their superparamagnetic nature. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available