4.7 Article

Fast Computation of Myelin Maps From MRI T2 Relaxation Data Using Multicore CPU and Graphics Card Parallelization

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 700-707

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24604

Keywords

quantitative MRI; T-2 relaxation; brain; myelin; multicore; graphics processing unit (GPU)

Funding

  1. MS/MRI Research Group at the University of British Columbia
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Milan and Maureen Ilich Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo develop a fast algorithm for computing myelin maps from multiecho T-2 relaxation data using parallel computation with multicore CPUs and graphics processing units (GPUs). Materials and MethodsUsing an existing MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA) implementation with basic (nonalgorithm-specific) parallelism as a guide, we developed a new version to perform the same computations but using C++ to optimize the hybrid utilization of multicore CPUs and GPUs, based on experimentation to determine which algorithmic components would benefit from CPU versus GPU parallelization. Using 32-echo T-2 data of dimensions 256 x 256 x 7 from 17 multiple sclerosis patients and 18 healthy subjects, we compared the two methods in terms of speed, myelin values, and the ability to distinguish between the two patient groups using Student's t-tests. ResultsThe new method was faster than the MATLAB implementation by 4.13 times for computing a single map and 14.36 times for batch-processing 10 scans. The two methods produced very similar myelin values, with small and explainable differences that did not impact the ability to distinguish the two patient groups. ConclusionThe proposed hybrid multicore approach represents a more efficient alternative to MATLAB, especially for large-scale batch processing. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;41:700-707. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available