4.7 Article

MR Pulse Wave Velocity Increases With Age Faster in the Thoracic Aorta Than in the Abdominal Aorta

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 765-772

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24592

Keywords

arterial stiffness; pulse wave velocity; aging; thoracic aorta; abdominal aorta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo assess the difference between thoracic and abdominal aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in apparently healthy subjects including young adults to elderly subjects. Materials and MethodsWe performed PWV and distensibility measurements and analysis of thoracic and abdominal aortic segments in 96 apparently normal subjects aged 20-80 years with magnetic resonance (MR). Both unadjusted correlation and General Linear Model (GLM) analysis of log-transformed PWV (thoracic and abdominal aorta) and distensibility (four aortic cross-sections) were performed. ResultsBoth thoracic and abdominal PWV values and distensibility values increased with age. In unadjusted analyses the correlation between the ln(thoracic PWV) and age (r=0.71; P<0.001) was stronger than between ln(abdominal PWV) and age (r=0.50; P<0.001). In GLM analysis, the only determinant of thoracic and abdominal PWV was age (F=42.5 and F=14.8, respectively; both P<0.001). Similarly, correlation between ln(distensibility) and age was strong (r=-0.79, r=-0.67, r=-0.71, and r=-0.65 for ascending, descending, diaphragmatic, and low abdominal aorta, respectively; all P<0.001). In GLM analysis, age was the major determinant for distensibility of the ascending aorta (F=81.7; P<0.001), descending aorta (F=42.2; P<0.001), diaphragmatic aorta (F=39.2; P<0.001), and low abdominal aorta (F=32.8; P<0.001). ConclusionThe thoracic aorta is less stiff than the abdominal aorta in young and middle-aged subjects, and stiffens more rapidly with age than the abdominal aorta, resulting in a stiffer thoracic than abdominal aorta at older age. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;41:765-772. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available