4.7 Article

Left atrial flow velocity distribution and flow coherence using four-dimensional FLOW MRI: A pilot study investigating the impact of age and Pre- and Postintervention atrial fibrillation on atrial hemodynamics

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 580-587

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23994

Keywords

atrial fibrillation; 4D flow MRI; flow quantification; cardiac magnetic resonance; flow imaging

Funding

  1. AHA [12GRNT12080032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To use four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI to characterize and quantify 3D blood flow in the left atria (LA) of patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). Materials and Methods: The 4D flow MRI was acquired in 19 volunteers (n = 9<30 years, n = 10>50 years) and 10 patients with AF (62 +/- 9.6 years; n = 4 in persistent AF, n = 6 postintervention). The LA in each dataset was segmented, and intra-atrial blood flow velocity was quantified. Flow coherence was measured as the consistency of the net blood flow vector. Results: Quantification of atrial flow revealed significant differences in atrial hemodynamics between age groups. Postintervention AF patients had a mean blood flow of 0.22 +/- 0.04 m/s, which was not significantly different than age-matched volunteers (0.21 +/- 0.03 m/s). Patients with persistent AF had a mean blood flow of 0.13 +/- 0.01 m/s, lower than AF patients in sinus rhythm (0.22 +/- 0.04 m/s, P = 0.005), or age-matched volunteers (0.21 +/- 0.03 m/s, P < 0.001). Flow coherence was significantly impaired in patients in AF. Conclusion: Flow-sensitive MRI shows that patients with a history of AF had global hemodynamics in the LA similar to those of age-matched volunteers. Additional studies with larger cohorts of AF patients and correlation with outcome are needed to further investigate the potential of atrial 4D flow MRI to flow patterns indicative of stroke risk in AF. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;38:580-587. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available