4.7 Article

Comparison of Three-Dimensional Pseudo-continuous Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Imaging With Gradient-Echo and Spin-Echo Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 427-433

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24178

Keywords

MRI; perfusion; dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC); arterial spin labeling (ASL); pseudo-continuous ASL (PCASL)

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC101-2314-B-182-063-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo compare the relative cerebral blood flow (CBF) obtained by pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling sequence incorporated with volumetric fast spin-echo readout (3D-PCASL) with those by gradient-echo (GE) and spin-echo (SE) dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI. Materials and MethodsThirty patients with various neurological diseases participated in this study. In addition to 3D-PCASL, 15 patients received GE-DSC and the others received SE-DSC imaging on a 3 Tesla scanner. A cortical gray matter (GM) to white matter (WM) and a thalamus (TM) to WM CBF ratio were determined from each perfusion scan. In addition, histograms of relative CBF distributions were obtained from each method for comparison. ResultsSignificant correlations of CBF ratios were found between 3D-PCASL and the two DSC methods (P<0.05). The 3D-PCASL resulted in GM/WM CBF ratios similar to SE-DSC but significantly smaller than GE-DSC (P=2.3 x 10(-7)). TM/WM CBF ratio obtained by 3D-PCASL was significantly smaller than those by GE- and SE-DSC (P=4.1 x 10(-7) and 1.2 x 10(-6), respectively). The histogram of relative CBF maps obtained from SE-DSC, after applied spatial smoothing, agreed well with that from 3D-PCASL. ConclusionThis study suggested that perfusion images obtained from 3D-PCASL exhibited significant correlations with DSC-MRI, with greater microvascular weighting like SE-DSC. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:427-433. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available