4.7 Article

Optimizing Isotropic Three-Dimensional Fast Spin-Echo Methods for Imaging the Knee

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1417-1425

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24315

Keywords

magnetic resonance imaging; three-dimensional fast-spin-echo; musculoskeletal imaging; sequence optimization

Funding

  1. RSNA Research Medical Student Grant
  2. NIH [R01 EB002524, R01 EB005790, K24 AR062068]
  3. GE Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo optimize acquisition parameters for three-dimensional fast spin-echo (3D FSE) imaging of the knee. Materials and MethodsThe knees of eight healthy volunteers were imaged in a 3 Tesla MRI scanner using an eight-channel knee coil. A total of 146 intermediate-weighted isotropic resolution 3D FSE (3D-FSE-Cube) images with varied acquisition parameter settings were acquired with an additional reference scan performed for subjective image quality assessment. Images were graded for overall quality, parallel imaging artifact severity and blurring. Cartilage, muscle, and fluid signal-to-noise ratios and fluid-cartilage contrast-to-noise ratios were quantified by acquiring scans without radiofrequency excitation and custom-reconstructing the k-space data. Mixed effects regression modeling was used to determine statistically significant effects of different parameters on image quality. ResultsChanges in receiver bandwidth, repetition time and echo train length significantly affected all measurements of image quality (P < 0.05). Reducing bandwidth improved all metrics of image quality with the exception of blurring. Reader agreement was slight to fair for subjective metrics, but overall trends in quality ratings were apparent. ConclusionWe used a systematic approach to optimize 3D-FSE-Cube parameters for knee imaging. Image quality was overall improved using a receiver bandwidth of +/- 31.25 kHz, and blurring increased with lower bandwidth and longer echo trains. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:1417-1425. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available