4.7 Article

Washout gradient in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is associated with tumor aggressiveness of prostate cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 912-919

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23723

Keywords

prostate cancer (PCA); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI); Gleason score (GS)

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC99-2321-B-002-037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To investigate the associations between dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) parameters and the Gleason score (GS) for prostate cancer (PCA) with localization information provided by concurrent apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Materials and Methods: Forty-three male patients received MR scans, including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and DCE MRI, on a 1.5 T MR system. All patients were confirmed to have PCA in the following biopsy within 2 weeks. ADC maps calculated from DTI were used to colocalize cancerous and noncancerous regions on DCE MRI for perfusion analysis retrospectively. Semiquantitative parameters (peak enhancement, initial gradient, and washout gradient [WG] and quantitative parameters [Ktrans, ?e, and kep]) were calculated and correlated with the GS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the perfusion parameters in assessing the aggressiveness of PCA. Results: A total of 41 PCA nodules were included in the analysis. Among all quantitative and semiquantitative parameters, only WG showed significant correlation with GS (r = -0.75, P < 0.0001). By defining tumor aggressiveness as a GS >6, WG demonstrated a good diagnostic performance, with the area under the ROC curve being 0.88. Under a cutoff point of WG = 0.125 min-1, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 and 0.78, respectively. Conclusion: WG shows a significant association with GS and good diagnostic performance in assessing tumor aggressiveness. Therefore, WG is a potential marker of GS. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:912919. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available