Journal
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 414-422Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23835
Keywords
T2*correction; R2*correction; hepatic steatosis; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; fat quantification; fat fraction
Funding
- NIH [R01 DK083380, R01 DK088925, RC1 EB010384, R01 DK096169]
- WARF Accelerator Program
- Coulter Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: To compare the performance of fat fraction quantification using single-R2* and dual-R2* correction methods in patients with fatty liver, using MR spectroscopy (MRS) as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: From a group of 97 patients, 32 patients with hepatic fat fraction greater than 5%, as measured by MRS, were identified. In these patients, chemical shift encoded fat-water imaging was performed, covering the entire liver in a single breathhold. Fat fraction was measured from the imaging data by postprocessing using 6 different models: single- and dual-R2* correction, each performed with complex fitting, magnitude fitting, and mixed magnitude/complex fitting to compare the effects of phase error correction. Fat fraction measurements were compared with co-registered spectroscopy measurements using linear regression. Results: Linear regression demonstrated higher agreement with MRS using single-R2* correction compared with dual-R2* correction. Among single-R2* models, all 3 fittings methods performed similarly well (slope = 1.0 +/- 0.06, r2 = 0.890.91). Conclusion: Single-R2* modeling is more accurate than dual-R2* modeling for hepatic fat quantification in patients, even in those with high hepatic fat concentrations. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;37:414422. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available