4.7 Article

Phase contrast MRI quantification of pulsatile volumes of brain arteries, veins, and cerebrospinal fluids compartments: Repeatability and physiological interactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 1055-1062

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23527

Keywords

brain; blood; cerebrospinal fluid; flow; volume changes; repeatability

Funding

  1. MTBH
  2. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To study measurement repeatability and physiological determinants on measurement stability for phase contrast MRI (PC-MRI) measurements of cyclic volume changes (Delta V) of brain arteries, veins, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartments. Materials and Methods: Total cerebral blood flow (tCBF), total internal jugular flow (tJBF) and spinal CSF flow at C2-C3 level and CSF in the aqueduct was measured using five repetitions in 20 healthy subjects. After subtracting net flow, waveforms were integrated to calculate DV of arterial, venous, and cerebrospinal fluid compartments. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure repeatability. Systematic errors were investigated by a series of phantom measurements. Results: For DV calculated from tCBF, tJBF and both CSF waveforms, the ICC was >= 0.85. DV from the tCBF waveform decreased linearly between repetitions (P 0.012). Summed CSF and venous volume being shifted out from the cranium was correlated with DV calculated from the tCBF waveform (r 0.75; P < 0.001). Systematic errors increased at resolutions < 4 pixels per diameter. Conclusion: Repeatability of DV calculated from tCBF, tJBF, and CSF waveforms allows useful interpretations. The subject's time in the MR system and imaging resolution should be considered when interpreting volume changes. Summed CSF and venous volume changes was associated with arterial volume changes. Key Words: brain; blood; cerebrospinal fluid; flow; volume changes; repeatability J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012; 35: 1055-1062. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available