4.7 Article

Reproducibility of MRI-Determined Proton Density Fat Fraction Across Two Different MR Scanner Platforms

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 928-934

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22701

Keywords

MR imaging-based fat quantification; hepatic steatosis; proton density fat fraction; PDFF; MR spectroscopy; MRS; chemical shift imaging; CSI

Funding

  1. General Electric (GE)
  2. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01 DK075128, U01DK061734]
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  4. San Diego EXPORT Center, National Center of Minority Health and Health Disparities [P60 MD00220]
  5. National Center for Research Resources for the General Clinical Research Center at UCSD [M01 RR000827]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined proton density fat fraction (PDFF) reproducibility across two MR scanner platforms and, using MR spectroscopy (MRS)-determined PDFF as reference standard, to confirm MRI-determined PDFF estimation accuracy. Materials and Methods: This prospective, cross-sectional, crossover, observational pilot study was approved by an Institutional Review Board. Twenty-one subjects gave written informed consent and underwent liver MRI and MRS at both 1.5T (Siemens Symphony scanner) and 3T (GE Signa Excite HD scanner). MRI-determined PDFF was estimated using an axial 2D spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence with low flip-angle to minimize T1 bias and six echo-times to permit correction of T2* and fat-water signal interference effects. MRS-determined PDFF was estimated using a stimulated-echo acquisition mode sequence with long repetition time to minimize T1 bias and five echo times to permit T2 correction. Interscanner reproducibility of MRI determined PDFF was assessed by correlation analysis; accuracy was assessed separately at each field strength by linear regression analysis using MRS-determined PDFF as reference standard. Results: 1.5T and 3T MRI-determined PDFF estimates were highly correlated (r = 0.992). MRI-determined PDFF estimates were accurate at both 1.5T (regression slope/intercept = 0.958/-0.48) and 3T (slope/intercept = 1.020/0.925) against the MRS-determined PDFF reference. Conclusion: MRI-determined PDFF estimation is reproducible and, using MRS-determined PDFF as reference standard, accurate across two MR scanner platforms at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available