4.7 Article

Correlation of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Data With Apoptotic and Proliferation Indexes in CT26 Colorectal Tumor Homografts in Balb/c Mouse

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 1171-1176

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22558

Keywords

ADC; apoptosis; proliferation; animal

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2006CB705706]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To investigate whether the percentage of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes could be used as an imaging marker related to tumor cell apoptotic and Ki-67 proliferation index of tumors. Materials and Methods: Mice bearing CT26 colorectal carcinoma tumors were scanned before radiotherapy, then divided into radiotherapy (n = 24) and control groups (n = 24). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and anatomic T2WI were performed on six randomly chosen mice in total from two groups at different timepoints after radiotherapy (4, 8, 12 hours, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 days). After imaging, six animals were sacrificed at each timepoint and histological analyses were undertaken. ADC maps were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis using built-in software (Functool, GE). Regions of interest were manually circumscribed for all high-signal areas on lesions observed during DWI. The percentage of ADC changes were calculated at predefined timepoints and compared with the apoptotic and proliferation index from the histological analyses by using the Pearson correlation test. Results: A significant positive correlation was found between the percentage of ADC changes of the viable tissue and apoptotic index. A significant negative correlation was found between the percentage of ADC changes of the viable tissue and Ki-67 proliferation index. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the percentage of ADC changes can be used as a measurement of cell apoptotic and proliferation index in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available