4.7 Article

Validation of Functional Diffusion Maps (fDMs) as a Biomarker for Human Glioma Cellularity

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 538-548

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22068

Keywords

diffusion MRI; brain tumor; glioma; functional diffusion maps; fDM

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI [R21-CA109820, RO1-CA082500]
  2. MCW Advancing Healthier Wisconsin
  3. MCW Translational Brain Tumor Research Program
  4. MCW Cancer Center Fellowship
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R21CA109280, R01CA082500, R01CA109820] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To present comprehensive examinations of the assumptions made in functional diffusion map (fDM) analyses and provide a biological basis for fDM classification. Materials and Methods: Sixty-nine patients with gliomas were enrolled in this study. To determine the sensitivity of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) to cellularity, cell density from stereotactic biopsy specimens was correlated with preoperative ADC maps. For definition of ADC thresholds used for fDMs, the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for changes in voxel-wise ADC measurements in normal appearing tissue was analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity to progressing disease was examined using both radiographic and neurological criteria. Results: Results support the hypothesis that ADC is inversely proportional to cell density with a sensitivity of 1.01 x 10(-7) [mm(2)/s]/[nuclei/mm(2)]. The 95% CI for white matter = 0.25 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, gray matter = 0.31 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, a mixture of white and gray matter = 0.40 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, and a mixture of white matter, gray matter. and cerebrospinal fluid = 0.75 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Application of these measurements as ADC thresholds produce varying levels of sensitivity and specificity to disease progression, which were all significantly better than chance. Conclusion: This study suggests fDMs are valid biomarkers for brain tumor cellularity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available