4.7 Article

Depression Severity Evaluation for Female Patients Based on a Functional MRI Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 1067-1074

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22161

Keywords

depression severity; fMRI; estimation model; fuzzy logic; Hamilton Depression Rating Scales (HAMD)

Funding

  1. National High-tech Research and Development Program of China [2008AA02Z410]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30900356]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [200802861079]
  4. Key Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science, Ministry of Education, China [CDLS-2009-07]
  5. National 973 Program of China [2007CD512303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To develop a functional MRI (fMRI) signal based model that can evaluate depression severity in a numeric form; therefore, depressed patients can be identified during the course of illness, independent from symptoms. Materials and Methods: Data from 20 medication-free depressed patients and 16 healthy subjects were analyzed. The event-related fMRI scanning features under sad facial emotional stimuli were extracted as model inputs. Fuzzy logic and a genetic algorithm were used to provide suitable model outputs for numeric estimations of depression. Results: The correlation value r between the model estimations and the professional Hamilton Depression Rating Scales (HAMD) was 0.7886 with P < 0.00016. A typical tracking history for a particular subject has also promised the possibility for early disease warning, when the clinal symptoms are ambiguous or recessive. Conclusion: A numeric and objective estimation for the course of illness can be provided. The model can be used by psychiatrists to track the recovery process. As a simple extended application, the proposed model can be applied to classify subjects into different patterns: major depression, moderate depression, or healthy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available