4.7 Article

Non-Invasive Visualization of Basilar Artery Perforators With 7T MR Angiography

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 544-550

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22250

Keywords

7T MR angiography; microvasculature; pontine artery; perforators; basilar artery

Funding

  1. Ministry for Health, Welfare Family Affairs [A085136]
  2. Korea government (MOST), Republic of Korea [20090065597]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To visualize the perforating arteries originating from basilar artery (BA) by using ultra-high resolution 7T MR angiography (MRA) and optimizing MR parameters as well as radio frequency (RF) coils, which may provide important information for neurosurgery and understanding diseases of the pons, but was unable to clearly visualize with conventional MRA techniques. Materials and Methods: Seven healthy volunteers (five males and two females. age [mean +/- SD] = 28.71 +/- 7.54 years) were scanned using optimized MR parameters to obtain images of pontine arteries (PAs) originating from the main trunk of BA. Two different volume coils and a phased array coil were designed and compared for this study. The images obtained at 7T MRA were compared with those at 1.5T and 3T MRA. Results: The results showed that PA imaging at 7T MRI consistently provided clearly identifiable vessels, which were difficult to visualize in MR angiograms obtained at 1.5T and 3T MRIs. Volume RF coils had higher sensitivity for the center of the brain, which enhanced PA imaging compared to phased array coil. The average number of PA branches in all seven subjects observable by 7T MRA was 7.14 +/- 2.79, and the visualized PA branches were found to mainly propagating on the surface of the pons. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that ultra-high resolution 7T MRA could delineate the PAs using optimized imaging parameters and volume RF coils compared to commercially available 1.5T and 3T MRIs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available