4.7 Article

Quantitative MRI Measurement of Lung Density Must Account for the Change in T(2)* With Lung Inflation

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 527-534

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21866

Keywords

lung water density; T(2)*; pulmonary edema; quantitative

Funding

  1. NIH [HL081171, HL080203]
  2. AHA [054002N]
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL080203, R01HL081171] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate lung water density at three different levels of lung inflation in normal lungs using a fast gradient echo sequence developed for rapid imaging. Materials and Methods: Ten healthy volunteers were imaged with a fast gradient echo sequence that collects 12 images alternating between two closely spaced echoes in a single 9-s breathhold. Data were fit to a single exponential to determine lung water density and T(2)*. Data were evaluated in a single imaging slice at total lung capacity (TLC), functional residual capacity (FRC), and residual volume (RV). Analysis of variance for repeated measures was used to stabstically evaluate changes in T(2)* and lung water density across lung volumes, imaging plane, and spatial locations in the lung. Results: In normal subjects (n = 10), T(2)* (and [lung density/water density]) was 1.2 +/- 0.1 msec (0.10 +/- 0.02), 1.8 +/- 0.2 ms (0.25 +/- 0.04), and 2.0 +/- 0.2 msec (0.27 +/- 0.03) at TLC, FRC, and RV, respectively. Results also show that there is a considerable intersubject variability in the values of T(2)*. Conclusion: Data show that T(2)* in the lung is, very short, and varies considerably with lung volume. Thus, if quantitative assessment of lung density within a breathhold is to be measured accurately, then it is necessary to also determine T(2)*.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available