4.7 Article

3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of rectal carcinoma at 3T: Correlation with microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor markers of tumor angiogenesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 1309-1316

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21378

Keywords

rectal carcinoma; magnetic resonance imaging; dynamic contrast enhancement; angiogenesis; tumor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To determine how dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI at 3T correlates with rectal carcinoma angiogenesis. Materials and Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) DCE MRI was performed in 38 patients (23 males, 15 females, mean age 60 years) with histologically-confirmed rectal carcinoma at 3T. Time-intensity curves MCs) were used to measure peak enhancement ratio (ERpeak, time to peak enhancement (T-peak) first enhancement time (Tfirst-enhance), and uptake rate for rectal tumor, normal rectal wall, and gluteal muscle. After tumor resection, microvascular density (MVD) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression were determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) stains on available specimens (N = 24) to correlate with DCE MRI. Results: Rectal carcinoma showed higher ERpeak (3.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.9 +/- 0.9, P < 0.001), higher uptake rate (2.8 +/- 1.5/minute vs. 1.2 +/- 0.9/minute, P < 0.001), earlier T-peak (88 +/- 56 seconds vs. 124 +/- 72 seconds, P = 0.027), and earlier Tfirst-enhance (34 +/- 6 seconds vs. 40 +/- 7 seconds, P = 0.008) than normal rectal wall. Adenocarcinoma had shorter T-peak compared to signet cell carcinoma (77 +/- 48 seconds vs. 160 +/- 62 seconds, P = 0.004). T-peak was negatively correlated with MVD (r = -0.516, P = 0.01) and the mean T-peak was significantly earlier for the VEGF-positive group compared to the VEGF-negative group (57 +/- 17 seconds vs. 107 +/- 64 seconds, P = 0.021). Conclusion: DCE MRI parameters help predict rectal tumor angiogenesis measured by MVD and VEGF expression and discriminate malignant from normal tissue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available