4.7 Article

Safety of Localizing Epilepsy Monitoring Intracranial Electroencephalograph Electrodes Using MRI: Radiofrequency-Induced Heating

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 1233-1244

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21583

Keywords

safety; intracranial EEG; MRI; electrodes heating; epilepsy surgery

Funding

  1. UK MRC [G0301067]
  2. Wellcome Trust [067176]
  3. MRC [G0301067] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0301067, G0200216] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To investigate heating during postimplantation localization of intracranial electroencephalograph (EEG) electrodes by MRI. Materials and Methods: A phantom patient with a realistic arrangement of electrodes was used to simulate tissue heating during MRI. Measurements were performed using 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T MRI scanners, using head- and body-transmit RF-coils. Two electrode-lead configurations were assessed: a standard condition with external electrode-leads physically separated and a fault condition with all lead terminations electrically shorted. Results: Using a head-transmit-receive coil and a 2.4 W/kg head-average specific absorption rate (SAR) sequence, at 1.5T the maximum temperature change remained within safe limits (< 1 degrees C). Under standard conditions, we observed greater heating (<= 2.0 degrees C) at 3T on one system and similar heating (<1 degrees C) on a second, compared with the 1.5T system. In all cases these temperature maxima occurred at the grid electrode. In the fault condition. larger temperature increases were observed at both field strengths, particularly for the depth electrodes. Conversely. with a body-transmit coil at 3T significant heating (+6.4 degrees C) was observed (same sequence, 1.2/0.5 W/kg head /body-average) at the grid electrode under standard conditions, substantially exceeding safe limits. These temperature increases neglect perfusion, a major source of heat dissipation in vivo. Conclusion: MRI for intracranial electrode localization can be performed safely at both 1.5T and 3T provided a head-transmit coil is used, electrode leads are separated, and scanner-reported SARs are limited as determined in advance for specific scanner models, RF coils and implant arrangements. Neglecting these restrictions may result in tissue injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available