4.3 Article

A framework for accurate determination of the T2 distribution from multiple echo magnitude MRI images

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Volume 244, Issue -, Pages 53-63

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.04.016

Keywords

T-2 distribution; MRI; Multi-echo; Magnitude; Rician; Gaussian; Signal; Probability integral transform

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  2. NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurement of the T-2 distribution in tissues provides biologically relevant information about normal and abnormal microstructure and organization. Typically, the T-2 distribution is obtained by fitting the magnitude MR images acquired by a multi-echo MRI pulse sequence using an inverse Laplace transform (ILT) algorithm. It is well known that the ideal magnitude MR signal follows a Rician distribution. Unfortunately, studies attempting to establish the validity and efficacy of the ILT algorithm assume that these input signals are Gaussian distributed. Violation of the normality (or Gaussian) assumption introduces unexpected artifacts, including spurious cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-like long T-2 components; bias of the true geometric mean T-2 values and in the relative fractions of various components; and blurring of nearby T-2 peaks in the T-2 distribution. Here we apply and extend our previously proposed magnitude signal transformation framework to map noisy Rician-distributed magnitude multi-echo MRI signals into Gaussian-distributed signals with high accuracy and precision. We then perform an ILT on the transformed data to obtain an accurate T-2 distribution. Additionally, we demonstrate, by simulations and experiments, that this approach corrects the aforementioned artifacts in magnitude multi-echo MR images over a large range of signal-to-noise ratios. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available