4.3 Article

The Fantastic Four: A plug 'n' play set of optimal control pulses for enhancing NMR spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Volume 228, Issue -, Pages 16-31

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.12.007

Keywords

Fanta4; Optimal control theory; Universal rotation pulses; Point-to-point rotation pulses

Funding

  1. DFG [GL 203/6-1, LU 835/2, LU 835/3, LU 835/4, LU 835/7, FOR 934, SFB 631]
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  3. HGF Program BioInterfaces
  4. National Science Foundation [CHE-0943441, CHE-1214006]
  5. Division Of Chemistry
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1214006] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present highly robust, optimal control-based shaped pulses designed to replace all 90 degrees and 180 degrees hard pulses in a given pulse sequence for improved performance. Special attention was devoted to ensuring that the pulses can be simply substituted in a one-to-one fashion for the original hard pulses without any additional modification of the existing sequence. The set of four pulses for each nucleus therefore consists of 90 degrees and 180 degrees point-to-point (PP) and universal rotation (UR) pulses of identical duration. These 1 ms pulses provide uniform performance over resonance offsets of 20 kHz (H-1) and 35 kHz (C-13) and tolerate reasonably large radio frequency (RF) inhomogeneity/miscalibration of +/- 15% (H-1) and +/- 10% (C-13), making them especially suitable for NMR of small-to-medium-sized molecules (for which relaxation effects during the pulse are negligible) at an accessible and widely utilized spectrometer field strength of 600 MHz. The experimental performance of conventional hard-pulse sequences is shown to be greatly improved by incorporating the new pulses, each set referred to as the Fantastic Four (Fanta4). (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available