4.3 Article

Design of a superconducting volume coil for magnetic resonance microscopy of the mouse brain

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Volume 191, Issue 2, Pages 231-238

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.12.018

Keywords

superconducting coil; microscopy; mouse brain; finite-element radiofrequency model; Helmholtz pair

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U24 CA092656-08, R24 CA092656, U24 CA092656] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [U24 RR021760, P41 RR005959-18, U24 RR021760-037970, P41 RR005959] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIBIB NIH HHS [T32 EB001040-05, T32 EB001040, R44 EB000381, R44 EB000381-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the design process of a superconducting volume coil for magnetic resonance microscopy of the mouse brain at 9.4 T. The yttrium barium copper oxide coil has been designed through an iterative process of three-dimensional finite-element simulations and validation against room temperature copper coils. Compared to previous designs, the Helmholtz pair provides substantially higher B, homogeneity over an extended volume of interest sufficiently large to image biologically relevant specimens. A custom-built cryogenic cooling system maintains the superconducting probe at 60 +/- 0.1 K. Specimen loading and probe retuning can be carried out interactively with the coil at operating temperature, enabling much higher through-put. The operation of the probe is a routine, consistent procedure. Signal-to-noise ratio in a mouse brain increased by a factor ranging from 1.1 to 2.9 as compared to a room-temperature solenoid coil optimized for mouse brain microscopy. We demonstrate images encoded at 10 x 10 x 20 mu m for an entire mouse brain specimen with signal-to-noise ratio of 18 and a total acquisition time of 16.5 h, revealing neuroanatomy unseen at lower resolution. Phantom measurements show an effective spatial resolution better than 20 mu m. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available