4.1 Article

Rheological Behaviors of Polypropylene/Poly(1-butene) Blends

Journal

JOURNAL OF MACROMOLECULAR SCIENCE PART B-PHYSICS
Volume 57, Issue 9, Pages 608-623

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00222348.2018.1500104

Keywords

Polypropylene; poly(1-butene); blends; rheological behavior; mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Nature Science Foundation of Shandong Province-Major basic research projects [ZR2017ZA0304]
  2. Shandong Provincial Key RD program [2015GGX102019]
  3. Nature Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2013BM004]
  4. Taishan Scholar Program
  5. Open Project of CAS Key Laboratory of Engineering Plastics (Institute of Chemistry)
  6. Yellow River Delta Scholar program (Office of National University Science & Technology Park Administrative Committee (China University of Petroleum))

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rheological behaviors of polypropylene (PP)/poly(1-butene) (PB) blends with homo-polypropylene (PP1) or impact polypropylene (PP2), a poly(propylene-co-ethylene) as the PP component were studied. With increasing of PB resin content for both PP/PB blends, the blends showed higher G'(), G''() and *() at low frequencies but lower values at high frequencies which implied that the processability was improved. A two-phase morphology was observed through the various rheological responses, including G'()- terminal region curves, Cole-Cole plots and the weighted relaxation spectra with the PB contents up to 40wt%. With the same PB content, the rheological parameters of the PP2/PB blends were quite different from those of the PP1/PB, which can be attributed to the stronger interaction between PB chains and the ethylene-co-propylene copolymer in PP2. The impact strength of the PP2/PB blends was improved dramatically over that of the PP1/PB. The more significant toughening effect for the PP2/PB blends can be attributed to the special responses of its rheological behaviors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available