4.1 Article

Mechanical Properties and Crystallization Behavior of Polycarbonate/Polypropylene Blends

Journal

JOURNAL OF MACROMOLECULAR SCIENCE PART B-PHYSICS
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 716-725

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00222348.2012.721659

Keywords

crystallization; mechanical properties; morphology; PC; PP blends

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51003088]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20100184120006]
  3. National Science and Technology Supporting Project Foundation of China [2007BAB08B05]
  4. Sishi Star Foundations of Southwest Jiaotong University
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [SWJTU12CX009, SWJTU11ZT10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanical properties, morphology, and crystallization behavior of polycarbonate (PC)/polypropylene (PP) blends, with and without compatibilizer, were studied by tensile and impact tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The tensile and impact strengths of PC/PP blends decreased with increasing the PP content due to poor compatibility between the two phases. But the addition of compatibilizer improved the mechanical properties of the PC/PP blends, and the maximum value of the mechanical properties, such as tensile and impact strengths of PC/PP (80/20wt%) blends, were obtained when the compatibilizer was used at the amount of 4 phr. The SEM indicated that the compatibility and interfacial adhesion between PC and PP phases were enhanced. DSC results that showed the crystallization and melting peak temperatures of PP increased with the increase of the PP content, which indicated that the amorphous PC affected the crystallization behavior. However, both the PC and compatibilizer had little effect on the crystallinity of PP in PC/PP blends based on both the DSC and XRD patterns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available