4.6 Article

Studies on the interactions of chloroquine diphosphate and phenelzine sulfate drugs with human serum albumin and human hemoglobin proteins by spectroscopic techniques

Journal

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages 87-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.03.015

Keywords

Human serum albumin; Hemoglobin; Interaction; Chloroquine diphosphate; Phenelzine sulfate; Fluorescence spectroscopy

Categories

Funding

  1. Scientific Research Projects. Coordination Unit of Akdeniz University [2010.01.0105.003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interactions of chloroquine diphosphate (CQP) and phenelzine sulfate (PS) drugs with human serum albumin (HSA) and human hemoglobin (HMG) proteins were investigated by various spectroscopic methods. It was found that CQP caused the fluorescence quenching of protein molecules through a static quenching mechanism, but PS did not. The values of Stern-Volmer quenching constant, bimolecular quenching constant, binding constant and number of binding site on the protein molecules were calculated for HSA-CQP and HMG-CQP systems at pH 7.4 and different temperatures. For CQP, there was only one binding site on HSA and HMG proteins and the binding affinity of HSA was higher than that of HMG. The binding constants decreased with increasing temperature. The values of negative enthalpy change and positive entropy change indicated that electrostatic interactions play an important role in the binding processes. In addition, the binding processes were spontaneous and carried out by exothermic reactions. According to Forster resonance energy transfer theory, the average binding distance between proteins and CQP was calculated as 3.72 nm for HSA-CQP system and 3.45 nm for HMG-CQP system. Circular dichroism analysis displayed that the addition of CQP led to a decrease in the a-helix amount of HSA and HMG proteins. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available