4.6 Article

Facile synthesis and morphology control of Zn2SiO4:Mn nanophosphors using mesoporous silica nanoparticles as templates

Journal

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
Volume 135, Issue -, Pages 79-83

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.10.036

Keywords

Nanophosphor; Template method; Zn2SiO4; Morphology control

Categories

Funding

  1. One Hundred Talents Program of CAS [09i4281c10]
  2. Main Direction Program of Knowledge Innovation of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCXZ-YW-453]
  3. Development and Demonstration of Digital Urban Environmental Network
  4. Special Program on Key Basic Research Project of China [2010CB434802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study offers a new method to facilely synthesize morphology-controllable Zn2SiO4:Mn nanophosphors. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) were employed both as nanoreactors and templates in this process. First, Zn2+ and Mn2+ ions were impregnated into the mesopores of MSNs. Second, Zn2+ and Mn2+ ions reacted with the MSNs at high temperature and a phase Zn2SiO4:Mn phosphors were synthesized at a temperature higher than 800 degrees C. Zn2SiO4:Mn phosphors with various sizes and morphologies were successfully synthesized by using the corresponding MSNs as templates. The influences of the annealing temperature, Zn/Si molar ratio, annealing time, and particle size on the photoluminescence intensities of the as-prepared nanophosphors were investigated and the results indicate that the annealing temperature and Zn/Si molar ratio are the main factors. The resulting samples exhibit tunable morphologies, non-agglomeration, narrow size distribution and intense emission at 525 nm. The advantages of this method include simplified procedure, low annealing temperature, timesaving, controllable sizes and morphologies, large-scale production and wide practicality for other phosphor materials. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available