4.2 Article

The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: Background and Consensus Recommendations From the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology

Journal

JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 205-242

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31825c31dd

Keywords

squamous intraepithelial lesion; human papillomavirus; superficially invasive carcinoma; p16; terminology

Funding

  1. American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP)
  2. College of American Pathologists (CAP)
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  4. NIH/National Institute of Allergy and infectious Disease
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. BD TriPath
  7. Hologic
  8. Pennsylvania State University
  9. University of Washington
  10. Oregon Dermatological Society
  11. CAP
  12. Cornell University
  13. University of Iowa
  14. US State Department
  15. US Agency for International Development
  16. MTM Laboratories
  17. BD Diagnostics, Veregen
  18. OncoHealth
  19. Indian Health Service
  20. ASCCP
  21. Gynecologic Oncology Group
  22. ACOG
  23. Michigan Hematology Oncology Association
  24. NIH/NCI
  25. ACOG District IV
  26. Minority Health Research Committee
  27. Toledo Hospital
  28. Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC)
  29. Florida OBGYN Society
  30. Kentucky ACOG Section
  31. Indiana ACOG Section
  32. ACOG District V
  33. Miami Grand Rounds
  34. Missouri OBGYN Associates
  35. Ohio Dermatologic Association
  36. Flint Hospital
  37. University of Wisconsin
  38. University of Connecticut
  39. Turkish Society
  40. NIH
  41. Washington University in St Louis
  42. Meridian Conferences
  43. SOGC
  44. Merck Frosst
  45. Merck and Co.
  46. Gilead Biosciences
  47. American Social Health Association
  48. University of Ottawa
  49. Thai Red Cross
  50. University of Minnesota
  51. University of Illinois
  52. University of British Columbia
  53. Louisiana State University
  54. American Association for Cancer Research
  55. Gynecologic Oncology Society of Canada
  56. University of Alberta
  57. European Society for Sexual Medicine
  58. Aura Biosciences
  59. Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology
  60. Merck Research Laboratories
  61. Meriter Foundation
  62. University of Chicago
  63. Chicago Dermatology Society
  64. Harvard Medical School
  65. Oakstone Medical Publishing
  66. National Library of Medicine
  67. New Mexico Department of Health/Center for Health Training
  68. Center for Health Training (Austin, TX)
  69. SouthEast Alaska Regional Health Corporation
  70. Arctic Slope Native Association
  71. Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation
  72. Breast Cancer Detection of Alaska
  73. Sutter Medical Center of Santa Rosa Medical
  74. AIDS Healthcare Foundation of Los Angeles
  75. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons
  76. Merck and Company
  77. NIH/AMC Working Group
  78. Canadian Institute of Health Research
  79. Institute of Science & Technology Partnerships, Canada
  80. Canadian Health Research Institute
  81. ASCP
  82. ASC
  83. Hartford Hospital
  84. PA Association of Pathologists, Gynecologic Oncology Group
  85. Scientific Symposium International (travel reimbursement included)
  86. Medical University of South Carolina
  87. California Society of Pathologists
  88. Burrough's Wellcome Fund
  89. NIH/National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  90. Roche
  91. Innovio
  92. Photocure
  93. BDD
  94. NIH for SEER, ovarian, and HPV research
  95. Indiana University
  96. McGill University
  97. United States Academy of Pathology
  98. Canadian Academy of Pathology
  99. University of New Mexico School of Medicine
  100. BD
  101. Merck, Inc
  102. Gen-Probe
  103. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The terminology for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated squamous lesions of the lower anogenital tract has a long history marked by disparate diagnostic terms derived from multiple specialties. It often does not reflect current knowledge of HPV biology and pathogenesis. A consensus process was convened to recommend terminology unified across lower anogenital sites. The goal was to create a histopathologic nomenclature system that reflects current knowledge of HPV biology, optimally uses available biomarkers, and facilitates clear communication across different medical specialties. The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) Project was cosponsored by the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and included 5 working groups; 3 work groups performed comprehensive literature reviews and developed draft recommendations. Another work group provided the historical background and the fifth will continue to foster implementation of the LAST recommendations. After an open comment period, the draft recommendations were presented at a consensus conference attended by LAST work group members, advisors, and representatives from 35 stakeholder organizations including professional societies and government agencies. Recommendations were finalized and voted on at the consensus meeting. The final, approved recommendations standardize biologically relevant histopathologic terminology for HPV-associated squamous intraepithelial lesions and superficially invasive squamous carcinomas across all lower anogenital tract sites and detail the appropriate use of specific biomarkers to clarify histologic interpretations and enhance diagnostic accuracy. A plan for disseminating and monitoring recommendation implementation in the practicing community was also developed. The implemented recommendations will facilitate communication between pathologists and their clinical colleagues and improve accuracy of histologic diagnosis with the ultimate goal of providing optimal patient care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available