3.9 Article

Calibrating the magnitude of the Toarcian carbon cycle perturbation

Journal

PALEOCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 495-509

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014PA002758

Keywords

Toarcian; oceanic anoxic event; black shale; organic matter; carbon isotopes

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sedimentary rocks recording the Toarcian oceanic anoxic event (T-OAE) are marked by a negative carbon isotope excursion (CIE) reaching up to -7 and ranking among the largest known in the Phanerozoic. These records suggest a dramatic perturbation of the carbon cycle that has been linked to the transfer of juvenile carbon from the endogenic to the exogenic reservoirs. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the Toarcian CIE varies significantly from one substrate to another, hence complicating mass balance evaluation of the potential driving mechanisms. Here we show, using high-resolution, paired records of C-13(total organic carbon (TOC)) and hydrogen index from the Denkingen core and Dotternhausen quarry (Germany), that the amplitude of the negative CIE in marine organic matter is considerably exaggerated by changes in organic matter sourcing. Our corrected 3-4 CIE implies a constant carbon isotope fractionation between organic and carbonate carbon across the T-OAE and may point to a prominent role of cyanobacteria as organic matter producers during the Early Jurassic. These results also suggest that the difference between inorganic and organic carbon isotope values in marine strata constitutes a poor proxy of pCO(2) levels across the T-OAE. Moreover, this corrected 3-4 CIE, together with evidence for >5 degrees C seawater warming across the T-OAE, point to the input of >25,000Gt C with much more C-13-enriched signature than previously modeled. Our results thus allow reconciling inorganic and organic C-13 records of the T-OAE and have important implications for the evaluation of their causal mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available