4.5 Article

Fuzzy fault tree analysis for fire and explosion of crude oil tanks

Journal

JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 1390-1398

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.08.022

Keywords

Crude oil tank; Fire and explosion; Fuzzy fault tree analysis; Occurrence probability; Importance analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50974105]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20105121110003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crude oil tank fire and explosion (COTFE) is the most frequent type of accident in petroleum refineries, oil terminals or storage which often results in human fatality, environment pollution and economic loss. In this paper, with fault tree qualitative analysis technique, various potential causes of the COTFE are identified and a COTFE fault tree is constructed. Conventional fault tree quantitative analysis calculates the occurrence probability of the COTFE using exact probability data of the basic events. However, it is often very difficult to obtain corresponding precise data and information in advance due to insufficient data, changing environment or new components. Fuzzy set theory has been proven to be effective on such uncertain problems. Hence, this article investigates a hybrid approach of fuzzy set theory and fault tree analysis to quantify the COTFE fault tree in fuzzy environment and evaluate the COTFE occurrence probability. Further, importance analysis for the COTFE fault tree, including the Fussell-Vesely importance measure of basic events and the cut sets importance measure, is performed to help identifying the weak links of the crude oil tank system that will provide the most cost-effective mitigation. Also, a case study and analysis is provided to testify the proposed method. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available