4.5 Article

Experimental investigations on the performance of a new design of foaming agent adding device used for dust control in underground coal mines

Journal

JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 1075-1084

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2012.07.023

Keywords

Dust suppression; Foaming agent; Jet; Adding ratio; Pressure loss

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012LWB03]
  2. Program for Postgraduates Research Innovation in University of Jiangsu Province [CXZZ11_0315]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51104153, 51134020]
  4. PAPDA
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to overcome the drawbacks of foam technology for controlling mine dust, an original design of foaming agent adding device was introduced, and its performance was investigated experimentally under different working flows and outlet pressures, and compared to the conventional jet adding device. The results show that the new design of the foaming agent adding device has a reasonable cavity negative pressure, does not produce cavitations, and has a lower inlet pressure demand with less pressure loss. Furthermore, it can add foaming agent at 0.5%-1.0% and regulate the proportions at this low ratio range continuously and stably, which significantly reduces the cost of controlling dust with foam. In addition, it decreases electric energy consumption and simplifies the foam system with no need for extra boosters. Besides, its effect on suppressing mine dust was investigated in the field via dust sample collections, and the results show that this new device is as effective at dust suppression as the conventional one. Therefore, it is believed that this study laid an important foundation for the widespread application of foam technology for dust control in underground coal mines. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available