4.4 Article

THE EARLY EVOLUTION OF RAY-FINNED FISHES

Journal

PALAEONTOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 213-228

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pala.12150

Keywords

Actinopterygii; Diversification; Hangenberg event; molecular clock; Neopterygii; Permo-Triassic extinction

Categories

Funding

  1. Fell Fund of the University of Oxford
  2. Leverhulme Trust (Leverhulme Prize)
  3. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2012-658]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NERC NE/1005536/1, NE/J022632/1]
  5. NERC [NE/J022632/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J022632/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) constitute approximately half of all living vertebrate species. A stable hypothesis of relationships among major modern lineages has emerged over the past decade, supported by both anatomy and molecules. Diversity is unevenly partitioned across the actinopterygian tree, with most species concentrated within a handful of geologically young (i.e. Cretaceous) teleost clades. Extant non-teleost groups are portrayed as living fossils', but this moniker should not be taken as evidence of especially primitive structure: each of these lineages is characterized by profound specializations. Attribution of fossils to the crowns and apical stems of Cladistia, Chondrostei and Neopterygii is uncontroversial, but placements of Palaeozoic taxa along deeper branches of actinopterygian phylogeny are less secure. Despite these limitations, some major outlines of actinopterygian diversification seem reasonably clear from the fossil record: low richness and disparity in the Devonian; elevated morphological variety, linked to increases in taxonomic dominance, in the early Carboniferous; and further gains in taxonomic dominance in the Early Triassic associated with earliest appearance of trophically diverse crown neopterygians.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available