4.1 Article

LC and LC-MS Evaluation of Stress Degradation Behavior of Carvedilol

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10826070802671481

Keywords

Accelerated stability; Carvedilol; Forced degradation; LC-MS; MS method; Tablets

Funding

  1. FIPE ( Fundo de Incentivo a` Pesquisa)
  2. FAPERGS (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, forced and accelerated degradation studies of carvedilol (CAR) were carried out according to ICH guideline Q1A (R2). The drug was subjected to acid (1.0N HCl), alkaline (1.0N NaOH), and neutral hydrolytic conditions by refluxing at 90C, as well as to oxidative (7.5% H2O2) decomposition, protected from light, at room temperature. Photolysis was carried out in solid state of the drug and in methanolic solution. The stress degradation samples were evaluated by LC and LC-MS. The kinetics of degradation were determined by the LC method, previously developed and validated for our group, that could separate the degradation products formed under various stress conditions. An LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated and was found to be precise, accurate, specific, and selective. Tablets of CAR from three different batches (A,B,C) were subjected to climate chamber with 402C and 75%5 relative humidity for 6 months to evaluate the stability under accelerated conditions. The samples were assayed by LC-MS/MS and UV methods. The weight variation, hardness, disintegration time, friability, content, and dissolution test were also performed. The drug was relatively stable under acidic, neutral, and photolytic stress conditions, but showed instability under alkaline and oxidative conditions. The LC-MS m/z values of the two products obtained under oxidative conditions were 224.3 and 283.3 Daltons, respectively. The parameters of quality such as hardness, disintegration time, and dissolution were influenced by humidity and temperature for product B.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available