4.6 Article

A specific, accurate, and sensitive measure of total plasma malondialdehyde by HPLC

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 852-858

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.D032698

Keywords

thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance; assay specificity; assay bias; lipid peroxidation; high-performance liquid chromatography

Funding

  1. Cunningham Trust, St Andrews, Scotland, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Malondialdehyde (MDA) is one of the most commonly reported biomarkers of lipid peroxidation in clinical studies. The reaction of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) with MDA to yield a pink chromogen attributable to an MDA-TBA(2) adduct is a common assay approach with products being quantified by ultraviolet-Vis assay as nonspecific TBA-reactive substances (TBARS) or chromatographically as MDA. The specificity of the TBARS assay was compared with both chromatographic assays for total plasma MDA. The levels of total plasma MDA were significantly lower than the plasma TBARS in each of the samples examined, and interestingly, the interindividual variation apparent in the level of plasma MDA was not evident in the plasma TBARS assay. Each of the four online chromatographic detectors yielded a precise, sensitive, and accurate determination of total plasma MDA, and selected-ion monitoring was the most-accurate assay (101.3%, n = 4). The online diode array detectors provided good assay specificity (peak purity index of 999), sensitivity, precision, and accuracy. This research demonstrates the inaccuracy that is inherent in plasma TBARS assays, which claim to quantify MDA, and it is proposed that the TBARS approach may limit the likelihood of detecting true differences in the level of lipid peroxidation in clinical studies.-Moselhy, H. F., R. G. Reid, S. Yousef, and S. P. Boyle. A specific, accurate, and sensitive measure of total plasma malondialdehyde by HPLC. J. Lipid Res. 2013. 54: 852-858.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available