4.6 Article

Assessment of cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors for interaction with proteins involved in the immune response to infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 967-974

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M002295

Keywords

atherosclerosis; high density lipoprotein; lipopolysaccharide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CETP inhibitor, torcetrapib, was prematurely terminated from phase 3 clinical trials due to an increase in cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality. Because nearly half of the latter deaths involved patients with infection, we have tested torcetrapib and other CETPIs to see if they interfere with lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) or bactericidal/permeability increasing protein (BPI). No effect of these potent CETPIs on LPS binding to either protein was detected. Purified CETP itself bound weakly to LPS with a Kd >= 25 uM compared with 0.8 and 0.5 nM for LBP and BPI, respectively, and this binding was not blocked by torcetrapib. In whole blood, LPS induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha normally in the presence of torcetrapib. Furthermore, LPS had no effect on CETP activity. We conclude that the sepsis-related mortality of the ILLUMINATE trial was unlikely due to a direct effect of torcetrapib on LBP or BPI function, nor to inhibition of an interaction of CETP with LPS. Instead, we speculate that the negative outcome seen for patients with infections might be related to the changes in plasma lipoprotein composition and metabolism, or alternatively to the known off-target effects of torcetrapib, such as aldosterone elevation, which may have aggravated the effects of sepsis.-Clark, R. W., D. Cunningham, Y. Cong, T. A. Subashi, G. T. Tkalcevic, D. B. Lloyd, J. G. Boyd, B. A. Chrunyk, G. A. Karam, X. Qiu, I-K. Wang, and O. L. Francone. Assessment of cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors for interaction with proteins involved in the immune response to infection. J. Lipid Res. 2010. 51: 967-974.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available