4.6 Article

Plasma turnover of 3,4-didehydroretinol (vitamin A2) increases in vitamin A-deficient rats fed low versus high dietary fat

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 694-703

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M800479-JLR200

Keywords

kinetic analysis; retinol; Windows version of Simulation, Analysis and Modeling software; adipose tissue

Funding

  1. International Life Sciences Institute Alex Malaspina Future Leader Award ( SAT)
  2. [NIHNIDDK 61973]
  3. [USDA NRI 2007-3520017729]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Relationships between increased adiposity and fat-soluble vitamin storage and metabolism are poorly understood. To examine these associations, 6% or 21% dietary fat was fed to rats for 11 weeks and tissue vitamin A storage determined. Two levels of supplemental vitamin A were administered. At the end of the tenth week, 3,4-didehydroretinol (DR) was administered orally, and its kinetics were followed for 1 week in serum and tissues. Model-based compartmental analysis was applied to these data. Kidney total retinol (R) concentrations were elevated in rats fed 6% compared with 21% dietary fat (n = 24/group). The fractional transfer coefficient (FTC) describing the movement of tracer from plasma to extravascular stores was two times higher in the 6% compared with the 21% fat group. Consistent with the elevated renal R in 6% fat fed rats, there was a 2-fold increase in the FTC representing tracer distribution from plasma to kidney in the 6% compared with 21% fat group. Taken together with a fat main effect on renal vitamin A, our data support the evidence that faster turnover of kidney R may help set the mechanism governing vitamin A tissue distribution during deficiency. Rats fed 21% versus 6% dietary fat conserved hepatic R more efficiently.-Escaron, A. L., M. H. Green, and S. A. Tanumihardjo. Plasma turnover of 3,4-didehydroretinol (vitamin A2) increases in vitamin A-deficient rats fed low versus high dietary fat. J. Lipid Res. 2009. 50: 694-703.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available