4.3 Article

The Challenge of Informed Consent and Return of Results in Translational Genomics: Empirical Analysis and Recommendations

Journal

JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 344-355

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12151

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [P50HG004488, U01HG006487, R01CA154517]
  2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [69763, U01HG006492, R01HG004500, P50HG003390, U01HG006485, R21HG00612]
  3. Genome Canada/Genome Quebec [R01HG006618, R21 HG006596, P50HG007257]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As exome and genome sequencing move into clinical application, questions surround how to elicit consent and handle potential return of individual genomic results. This study analyzes nine consent forms used in NIH-funded sequencing studies. Content analysis reveals considerable heterogeneity, including in defining results that may be returned, identifying potential benefits and risks of return, protecting privacy, addressing placement of results in the medical record, and data-sharing. In response to lack of consensus, we offer recommendations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available