4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Incidental findings in CT colonography: Literature review and survey of current research practice

Journal

JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 320-+

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00276.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [R01HG003178] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [R01 HG003178, R01 HG003178-01A1, R01 HG 003178] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Incidental findings (IFs) of potential medical significance are seen in approximately 5-8 percent of asymptomatic subjects and 16 percent of symptomatic subjects participating in large computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) studies, with the incidence varying further by CT acquisition technique. While most CTC research programs have a well-defined plan to detect and disclose IFs, such plans are largely communicated only verbally. Written consent documents should also inform subjects of how IFs of potential medical significance will be detected and reported in CTC research studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available