4.5 Article

18F-FDG Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Findings of Radiographic Lesions Suggesting Old Healed Tuberculosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 386-391

Publisher

KOREAN ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.3.386

Keywords

Positron-Emission Tomography; Tomography; X-Ray Computed; Tuberculosis; Pulmonary; Latent Tuberculosis; Interferon-gamma Release Tests

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of radiographic lesions suggesting old healed tuberculosis (TB) is one of the strongest risk factors for the subsequent development of active TB. We elucidated the metabolic activity of radiographic lesions suggesting old healed TB using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18-FDG PET/CT). This cross-sectional study included 63 participants with radiographic lesions suggesting old healed TB and with available F-18-FDG PET/CT scans. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured in the lesions, the clinical characteristics, results of the tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) were analyzed. The SUVmax in old healed TB was 1.5 or higher among nine (14.3%) participants. Age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.46), history of previous TB (aOR, 60.43; 95% CI, 1.71-2131.65), and extent of the lesions (aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75) were associated with higher SUVmax. The positive rates for the TST and IGRA were not different between groups with and without increased FDG uptake. Increased FDG uptake on F-18-FDG PET/CT was observed in a subset of patients with radiographic lesions suggesting old healed TB. Given that the factors associated with increased FDG uptake are known risk factors for TB development, the possibility exists that participants with old healed TB lesions with higher SUV on F-18-FDG PET/CT scans might be at higher risk for active TB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available