4.5 Article

The interaction of gabapentin and N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine R-(-)isomer (R-PIA) on mechanical allodynia in rats with a spinal nerve ligation

Journal

JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 678-684

Publisher

KOREAN ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.4.678

Keywords

adenosine; drug interactions; gabapentin; pain

Funding

  1. Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Seoul, Korea [2006-311]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the antiallodynic interaction between gabapentin and adenosine All receptor agonist, N-6-(2-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine R-(-)isomer (R-PIA), in a rat model of nerve ligation injury. Rats were prepared with ligation of left L5-6 spinal nerves and intrathecal catheter implantation for drug administration. Mechanical allodynia was measured by applying von Frey filaments. Gabapentin and R-PIA were administered to obtain the dose-response curve and the 50% effective dose (ED50). Fractions of ED50S were administered concurrently to establish the ED50 of the drug combination. The drug interaction between gabapentin and R-PI A was. analyzed using the isobolographic method. Adenosine A1 receptor antagonist was administered intrathecally to examine the reversal of the antiallodynic effect. Locomotor function changes were evaluated by rotarod testing. Intrathecal gabapentin and R-PIA and their combination produced a dose-dependent antagonism against mechanical allodynia without severe side effects. Intrathecal gabapentin synergistically enhanced the antiallodynic effect of R-PIA when coadministered. There were no significant changes in rotarod performance time, except gabapentin 300 mu g In the combination group, the maximal antiallodynic effect was reversed by A1 adenosine receptor antagonist. These results suggest that activation of adenosine A1 receptors at the spinal level is required for the synergistic interaction on the mechanical allodynia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available