4.2 Article

miR-17-5p as a Novel Prognostic Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 156-161

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/08941939.2011.618523

Keywords

miR-17-5p; miRNA; hepatocellular carcinoma; prognosis; metastasis; biomarker

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: miRNAs are frequently deregulated in cancer and have shown promise as tissue-based markers for cancer classification and prognostication. Emerging evidence indicates that miR-17-5p plays an important role in carcinogenesis. However, the expression of miR-17-5p in HCC tissues and its clinical relevance has not been systematically studied yet, and whether miR-17-5p expression has influence on prognosis of HCC is still unknown. In this study, we investigate the expression and clinical significance of miR-17-5p in human HCC. Methods: The expression levels of miR-17-5p were measured in 120 paired hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and paracarcinomatous liver tissues (PCLTs) derived from patients who underwent hepatic resection by qRT-PCR. Furthermore, the correlation of miR-17-5p levels with clinicopathologic variables and prognosis was analyzed. Results: miR-17-5p was significantly upregulated in HCCs (p < .001). Furthermore, HCC with metastasis had higher miR-17-5p levels than that without metastasis (p < .001). Importantly, the elevated expression of miR-17-5p correlated with multiple tumor nodules (p = .046), worse Edmondson-Steiner grade (p = .024), vein invasion (p = .001), shortened overall survival (p = .012), and disease-free survival (p = .011) of HCC. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that miR-17-5p was an independent risk factor for overall survival and disease-free survival (p = .002 and p = .042, respectively). Conclusion: miR-17-5p is highly elevated in HCC, especially in HCC with metastasis. miR-17-5p can serve as a novel prognostic marker for HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available