4.3 Article

Case-control study examining the association between allopurinol use and ischemic cerebrovascular disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 48-51

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jim-2018-000774

Keywords

cardiovascular diseases

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan [MOHW107-TDU-B-212-123004]
  2. China Medical University Hospital [DMR-107-192]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Few studies focus on the relationship between allopurinol and ischemic cerebrovascular disease. The goal of the study was to investigate the association of long-term therapy of allopurinol with the first-time attack of ischemic cerebrovascular disease in Taiwan. We performed a case-control study using the database of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Program. The case group included 14,937 subjects aged 20-84 years with the first-time attack of ischemic cerebrovascular disease from 2000 to 2013. The control group included 14,937 sex-matched and age-matched subjects aged 20-84 years without any type of cerebrovascular disease. Ever use of allopurinol was defined as subjects who had at least a prescription for allopurinol before the index date. The OR and the 95% CI for ischemic cerebrovascular disease associated with allopurinol use were measured by the multivariable logistic regression model. The adjusted OR of ischemic cerebrovascular disease was 0.992 (95% CI 0.989 to 0.996) for subjects with increasing cumulative duration of allopurinol use for every 1 month, compared with never use. In a further analysis, the adjusted OR of ischemic cerebrovascular disease was 0.74 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.96) for cumulative duration of allopurinol use >3 years, compared with never use. Our findings suggest that lone-term therapy of allopurinol >3 years is associated with decreased risk of the first-time attack of ischemic cerebrovascular disease, compared with no allopurinol therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available