4.7 Article

Regenerative Hair Waves in Aging Mice and Extra-Follicular Modulators Follistatin, Dkk1, and Sfrp4

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue 8, Pages 2086-2096

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2014.139

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the US National Institutes of Health [RO1-AR42177, AR60306]
  2. Taiwan NSC [100-2314-B-075-044, 101-2314-B-075-008-MY3]
  3. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [R11004]
  4. Yen Tjing Ling Medical Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hair cycling is modulated by factors both intrinsic and extrinsic to hair follicles. Cycling defects lead to conditions such as aging-associated alopecia. Recently, we demonstrated that mouse skin exhibits regenerative hair waves, reflecting a coordinated regenerative behavior in follicle populations. Here, we use this model to explore the regenerative behavior of aging mouse skin. Old mice (>18 months) tracked over several months show that with progressing age, hair waves slow down, wave propagation becomes restricted, and hair cycle domains fragment into smaller domains. Transplanting aged donor mouse skin to a young host can restore donor cycling within a 3 mm range of the interface, suggesting that changes are due to extracellular factors. Therefore, hair stem cells in aged skin can be reactivated. Molecular studies show that extra-follicular modulators Bmp2, Dkk1, and Sfrp4 increase in early anagen. Further, we identify follistatin as an extra-follicular modulator, which is highly expressed in late telogen and early anagen. Indeed, follistatin induces hair wave propagation and its level decreases in aging mice. We present an excitable medium model to simulate the cycling behavior in aging mice and illustrate how the interorgan macroenvironment can regulate the aging process by integrating both activator and inhibitor signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available