4.7 Article

CD8+ T Cells in the Lesional Skin of Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis Patients Are an Important Source of IFN-γ, IL-13, IL-17, and IL-22

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
Volume 133, Issue 4, Pages 973-979

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.456

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Damon Runyon Clinical Investigator Award
  2. NIH/NCI [P50 CA9368305]
  3. NIH/NIAID [R01 A1025082]
  4. University Medical Center Utrecht Internationalization Committee
  5. [R01 AR056720]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although CD4(+) T cells are known to contribute to the pathology of atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis, the role of CD8(+) T cells in these diseases remains poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to characterize the cytokine production of T cells from AD and psoriasis skin. We found that CD4(+) T cells isolated from AD skin were largely Th2 (T helper type 2) biased, in agreement with prior reports. However, we also observed large numbers of CD8(+) T cells producing IL-13, IFN-gamma, and IL-22. We observed increased numbers of CD8(+) T cells isolated from AD skin, and immunohistochemistry studies confirmed the presence of CD8(+) T cells in the dermis and epidermis of AD skin lesions. Surprisingly, T-cell cytokine production was similar in the lesional and nonlesional skin of patients with AD. T cells from psoriatic lesional skin predominantly produced IFN-gamma, IL-17, and IL-22, in agreement with prior studies. However, in addition to Th17 cells, we observed high percentages of CD8(+) T cells that produced both IL-22 and IL-17 in psoriatic skin lesions. Our findings demonstrate that CD8(+) T cells are a significant and previously unappreciated source of inflammatory cytokine production in both AD and psoriasis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2013) 133, 973-979; doi:10.1038/jid.2012.456; published online 6 December 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available