4.7 Article

Contrasting Roles of the IL-1 and IL-18 Receptors in MyD88-Dependent Contact Hypersensitivity

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 184-191

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2009.242

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  2. National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIAMS) [K08 A1071016-01]
  4. Dermatology Foundation
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [K08AR055156] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contact hypersensitivity (CHS) requires activation of the innate immune system, and results in an adaptive immune response. Many cells of the innate immune system use Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which signal through the adaptor protein, MyD88, to initiate an immune response. MyD88 is also required for signaling downstream of the IL-1 and Il-18 receptors (IL-1R and IL-18R, respectively). Herein, we studied the MyD88 signaling pathway in the CHS response to DNFB. Mice deficient in MyD88 were unable to mount a CHS response to DNFB. In contrast, mice deficient in Toll/IL-1R-containing adaptor-inducing IFN-beta, TLR2, TLR4, TLR6, and TLR9 had no defect in their ability to respond to DNFB. Although both IL-1R and IL-18R-deficient mice showed a reduced CHS response to DNFB, in bone marrow chimera and adoptive transfer experiments, we found that MyD88 and the IL-18R were required in a radioresistant cell in the sensitization phase of the CHS response. In contrast, similar strategies revealed that the IL-1R was required in a radiosensitive cell in the sensitization phase of the CHS response. Taken together, these data indicate that the IL-1R and IL-18R/MyD88 pathways are required in distinctly different cells during the sensitization phase of CHS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available