Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The outcome of intra-aortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: A comprehensive meta-analysis
Francesco Romeo et al.
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL (2013)
Percutaneous Left-Ventricular Support With the Impella-2.5-Assist Device in Acute Cardiogenic Shock Results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-Registry
Alexander Lauten et al.
CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE (2013)
Intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results of the ALKK-PCI registry
Uwe Zeymer et al.
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY (2013)
A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention The PROTECT II Study
William W. O'Neill et al.
CIRCULATION (2012)
Intraaortic Balloon Support for Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock
Holger Thiele et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2012)
HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON COUNTERPULSATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION COMPLICATED BY CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: THE PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED IABP SHOCK TRIAL
Roland Prondzinsky et al.
SHOCK (2012)
The Ability to Achieve Complete Revascularization Is Associated with Improved In-hospital Survival in Cardiogenic Shock due to Myocardial Infarction: Manitoba Cardiogenic Shock Registry Investigators
Farrukh Hussain et al.
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS (2011)
The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: The Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience
Annemarie E. Engstrom et al.
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE (2011)
2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions
Glenn N. Levine et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2011)
Effect of Multivessel Coronary Disease With or Without Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusion on One-Year Mortality in Patients Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock
Rene J. van der Schaaf et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY (2010)
Thirty-Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction A Population-Based Perspective
Robert J. Goldberg et al.
CIRCULATION (2009)
A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines?
Krischan D. Sjauw et al.
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2009)
Ten-Year Trends in the Incidence and Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock
Raban V. Jeger et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2008)
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Caused by Myocardial Infarction
Melchior Seyfarth et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2008)
Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5
JPS Henriques et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY (2006)
Correlates of one-year survival in patients with Cardiogenic complicating acute myocardial shock infarction - Angiographic findings from the SHOCK trial
TA Sanborn et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2003)
Implications of the timing of onset of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: A report from the SHOCK Trial Registry
JG Webb et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2000)
Share Paper
