4.1 Article

Preparation for becoming members of health care teams: findings from a 5-year evaluation of a student interprofessional training ward

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 328-332

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2011.578222

Keywords

Collaborative competence; collaborative outcomes; interprofessional education; integration; interdisciplinary; patient-centred practice; team-based care; undergraduate; interprofessional training ward

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Setting. An orthopaedic interprofessional training ward manned by students at a University Hospital. Objective. To assess to what extent students from different undergraduate programmes evaluated the effects of a 2-week rotation at the ward on their professional roles and the value of teamwork within health care. Method. A questionnaire was filled in by 841 students by the end of a 2-week rotation at the ward over 5 years. Questions concerned students' estimate of how the rotation had strengthened their insight into their own future professional role, into other students' professional roles and into the value of teamwork within health care. Differences between the different student categories and possible associations between the different estimates were statistically analysed. Results. Students from all programmes reported that the rotation at the student ward had dramatically strengthened their insight about their own future professional role as well as the roles of the other professions and the value of teamwork within health care. Conclusion. Health care is a complicated system based on cooperation and professionalism. We suggest that interprofessional training of students from all professions within health care should be a part of their education as a worthwhile preparation for their future professional work and to ensure high-quality health care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available