4.3 Article

Key Performance Indicators in Intensive Care Medicine. A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 1267-1284

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/147323000903700502

Keywords

CRITICAL CARE; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; OUTCOME; MORTALITY; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Expert panel consensus was used to develop evidence-based process indicators that were independent risk factors for the main clinical outcome parameters of length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality. In a retrospective, matched data analysis of patients from five ICUs at a tertiary university hospital, agreed process indicators (sedation monitoring, pain monitoring, mean arterial pressure [MAP] >= 60 mmHg, tidal volume [TV] <= 6 ml/kg body weight, peak inspiratory pressure [PIP] <= 35 cmH(2)O and blood glucose [BG] >= 80 and <= 130 mg/dl) were validated using a prospective dataset of 4445 consecutive patients. After matching for age, sex and ICU, 634 patients were analysed. Logistic regression of the 634 patients showed that monitoring analgesia and sedation, MAP >= 60 mmHg and BG >= 80 mg/dl were relevant for survival. Linear regression of the 634 patients showed that analgesia monitoring, PIP <= 35 cmH(2)O and TV <= 6 ml/kg were associated with reduced length of ICU stay. Linear regression on all 4445 patients showed analgesia, sedation monitoring, MAP 60 mmHg, BG >= 80 mg/dl and <= 130 mg/dl, PIP <= 35 cmH(2)O and TV <= 6 ml/kg were associated with reduced length of ICU stay, indicating that adherence to evidence-based key process indicators may reduce mortality and length of ICU stay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available