4.7 Article

Vaccination against type 1 diabetes

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 269, Issue 6, Pages 626-635

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02386.x

Keywords

autoantibodies; GAD65; IA-2; insulin; ZnT8 transporter

Funding

  1. Swedish Child Diabetes Foundation
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Swedish Diabetes Association
  4. Knut & Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  5. UMAS Funds
  6. Skane County Council of Research and Development
  7. National Institutes of Health [DK063861]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Larsson HE, Lernmark A (Lund University/CRC, Skane University Hospital SUS, Malmo, Sweden). Vaccination against type 1 diabetes (Foresight). J Intern Med 2011; 269: 626-635. The clinical onset of type 1 diabetes or autoimmune diabetes occurs after a prodrome of islet autoimmunity. The warning signals for the ensuing loss of pancreatic islet beta cells are autoantibodies against insulin, GAD65, IA-2 and ZnT8, alone or in combinations. Autoantibodies against, for example, insulin alone have only a minor risk of type 1 diabetes. However, progression to clinical onset is increased by the induction of multiple islet autoantibodies. At the time of clinical onset, insulitis may be manifest, which seems to reduce the efficacy of immunosuppression. Autoantigen-specific immunotherapy with alum-formulated GAD65 (Diamyd (R)) shows promise to reduce the loss of beta-cell function after the clinical onset of type 1 diabetes. The mechanisms are unclear but may involve the induction of T regulatory cells, which may suppress islet autoantigen reactivity. Past and ongoing clinical trials have been safe. Future clinical trials, perhaps as combination autoantigen-specific immunotherapy, may increase the efficacy in preventing the clinical onset in subjects with islet autoantibodies or preserve residual beta-cell function in patients newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available